Slavery In Rome And China

Slavery was more important to Rome than China. This arises from the fact that Romans were constantly and rapidly conquering new territories, and slaves continued to flood in. This surplus of slaves lead them to be very cheap, cheaper than peasant labor, and therefore slaves were adopted as the major workers of the Roman economy. In China however, they were isolated, and there was little new territorial acquisitions from which slaves could be acquired. This lead to a lower number of slaves, making them more expensive and therefore less of a part of the economy. Slaves were treated harsher in Rome because they were so cheap and abundant that they were viewed as disposable. In China, where they were rarer and more expensive, they were viewed as more valuable and hence treated with greater caution.

Class Reflection

Interesting class. I may have gotten a little bit carried away with the whole democracy thing. I still am not convinced about the Republic being a democracy. Democracy is government by the people. In the Roman Republic, only members of an elite aristocracy could hold governmental posts. Therefore, the government is not by the people, but by the members of the aristocracy.

Class Reflection

Todays test was fair, despite the time restrictions. I think that being allowed to do the paragraph at home will be beneficial. Not much else about todays test that I can reveal.

Ancient Greece Exam

I am considering several topics for my compare-contrast paragraph:

• Gender Roles
• Political Structure
• Economics
  
• Religion
• Philosophy
  
• Artistic

I think the multiple choice section will be fairly easy. We have read the textbook sections on Greece fairly recently, and it will probably remain fresh in our minds.

Class Reflection

Mrs. Daley was absent for today's class (jury duty?). We began work on the Stearns book's section of Hellenism in India.

Class Reflection

I thought today's class discussion was quite perceptive. I find Aristotle's views, particularly those on gender roles, to be, while still patriarchal, much less extreme than those of Hinduism and Confucianism. I however met some disagreement in my group. If anyone has strong evidence to the contrary I would sincerely be intrigued in hearing it. I am beggining to feel the redundancy of our studies of Greece in Global Studies with those in AP World history lab. It is, I must say, quite frustrating.

Class Reflection

I thought today's video was quite interesting. What I found most shocking was the gender roles of Sparta. I had always thought of Sparta as the crude, barbaric, back-ward looking city-state, and Athens as the cultured, educated, and progressive city-state. Given these assumptions, I though for sure that Women would be treated much better in Athenian society than in Spartan. Alas, the opposite was surprisingly true as we saw in the video. I was also surprised similarly of the encouragement of Homosexual behavior by Sparta. In this case again, based on what I already knew about the two city-states, I expected that Athens would be much more accepting.

Is Geography Destiny?

Athens and Sparta were two civilizations that evolved in nearly identical geography. They were, however, radically different. If geography is the determining factor in destiny, how can this be so?

Greece in the Classical Period

Being intrigued by the "Egypt and The Middle East: Contact woth Eary Greece" article, I searched for some more resources about the classical development of Greece. I found several useful sites.

• The first one I discovered included extensive writing on all aspects of Ancient Greek culture, including art & architecture, history, olympics, wars, geography, mythology, people, culture & society.

• The second one that I discovered was a comprehensive history of Greek civilization. It included hundreds of links at the bottom of the page to all aspects of greek civilization.

For more links see my Classical Links section on the right panel of my blog.

Egypt and the Middle East: Contact with Early Greece

I thought this was a perceptive article. Yet another work of Peter Stearns (see posting "Peter Stearns"). I wonder where our next unit will go? Based on this article, I guess that we will shift our focus from classical Eastern syncretism to look at classical western syncretism.

These are my responses to the questions:
(Note: Do not copy these responses. They are my own intellectual property.)

1. Thesis Statement: “What is undeniable, however, is that several exchange points did exist during the heyday of the Middle East and Egypt, and that Greeks borrowed extensively but also combined influences with local features in novel ways-and all this well in advance of the rise of more characteristic Greek styles and institutions from about 800 BCE onward”

2. The early societies of Greece, Egypt, and The Middle East had many interactions. These came in several forms. One major form of interaction was invasion. As one civilization invaded another, it brought with it cultural aspects that then diffused into local society. Another major form of interaction was trade. As merchants traveled with their goods they brought with them cultural aspects which would then diffuse. These factors of trade and invasion constitute the main interactions of these early civilizations.

3. These societies were greatly impacted by the interactions outlined in #2. As societies interact, cultural diffusion occurs. The areas in which the societies were impacted are, as Stearn's stated, “writing, artistic styles, technology (including weaponry), and some religious elements.” Egyptian and Middle Eastern societies, through interactions and diffusion, helped to shape Greek culture. However, the process was syncretic, and many native elements remained influential. It was more borrowing and blending than wholesale adoption.

4. The societies involved benefited greatly from these interactions. The direct benefits from trade are obviously the exchange of useful materials. The benefits of being invaded are less apparent. The main benefits come in the form of the cultural diffusion described in the previous response. The exchange of ideas is even more beneficial in the long run than the exchange of materials. The best aspects of both cultures can be picked out (through syncretic cultural diffusion) to make a more advanced culture overall.

Class Reflection

Today's class was interesting. Despite a small problem with some people not doing the region they were assigned to, we managed a productive discussion in our group. I remains a little confused about Korea's and Japan's belief systems? Were they Confucian? I also found trouble finding any fundamental differences between the syncretism in the three different regions. I am beginning to find our work on Buddhism's syncretism into China redundant. Does anyone else agree?

Tuesday's Class

I missed my second AP class in a row due to illness on Tuesday. I look forward to catching up at next Monday's class

Collapse!: Lecture Series by Jared Diamond

A very interesting series of lectures by Jared Diamond, author of Guns, Germs. And Steel, on the collapse of civilizations:

1. Part One
2. Part Two
3. Part Three
   
4. Part Four
   

Global Studies Great Debates Unit

There is much question among students of AP world history as to what our focus will be in the class while Global Classes focus on debates. I have heard extreme claims that we will halt activities all-together so as not to get ahead of the Global Studies course. I doubt this severely. More likely we will take this time to focus in more on our overarching AP themes, or gender roles, or the AP essay and test format, or we may just continue plowing ahead. I wonder which direction we will take.

My Thoughts On History

In response to Marcus H.'s posting on history (see "why I like history" on his blog) :

I agree with Marcus. History is a fascinating subject to me. It is true, as Marcus says, that it is nearly impossible to be a responsible citizen without knowing history. This is because history, as you may recall the Stearn's article we read at the beginning of the year pointed out, provides the only lab in which we may find enough data to gain an accurate understanding of the actions, patterns, nature, evolution, thoughts, and essence of human beings.

Peter Stearns

In the course we have been hearing a lot about a man named Peter Stearns (pictured above). We have read sections from his book on gender roles, he wrote the "Why Study History Article" that we read at the beginning of the year, and he is one of the authors of our "Documents In World History" books. I am sure I am not alone in wondering

"Who is this guy?"

I decided to find out. Follow this link to the wikipedia article on Peter Stearns. This was unfortunately the best source I could find, even considering its potential unreliability.

I'm Missing Friday's Class

I am going to be on a Design And Draw For Production field trip on Friday so I will unfortunately miss our class. Can anyone fill me in on what we covered. If anyone could help me out I would greatly appreciate it!

Welcome

I'm new to the blog. This should be cool. I prefer this to writing with pencil and paper. I have a feeling I will end up spending alot of time on this.